Billionaire Bill Gates is using his vast resources to help the United Nations (UN) rapidly advance plans to eliminate traditional meat and dairy from the food supply and replace them with hyper-processed insect-based products.
Singapore recently became the latest country to authorize insect products for human consumption.
The Guardian described the move to flood the food supply with insects as one that “paves the way for plates to become wrigglier, leggier and more sustainable.”
The newspaper argues that authorization in Singapore is “a sign of things to come” on a global level.
On 8 July, the Singapore Food Agency announced it had approved 16 insects for human consumption as “food.”
The approved insects include mealworms and silkworm pupa.
Singapore is just the latest country to approve insects for public consumption, however.
The European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, and other countries have also approved certain insects for human consumption.
So far, each nation has issued requirements for clear labeling of food products containing insects.
Unfortunately, the United States does not have these same requirements.
Gaps in U.S. regulations have enabled “alternative protein” startups to covertly enter the insect food market, without the need to inform consumers.
These insect-based “food” startups are rapidly expanding in America due to the backing of figures such as Bill Gates and government agencies including the United Nations (UN), the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the National Science Foundation.
The trend toward insect-based foods is linked to the UN’s Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
The UN’s SDG promotes sustainability and forced behavioral modifications.
Experts are now increasingly raising the alarm about the flood of insects in the food supply.
Michael Rectenwald, author of “The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty: Unravelling the Global Agenda,” warns:
“The insect craze is intimately connected to the UN’s Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”
Seamus Bruner, author of “Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life” and director of research at the Government Accountability Institute, notes:
“The World Economic Forum – perhaps the largest driving force behind so-called ‘alternative proteins’ – frequently touts Singapore’s compliance with Agenda 2030, so the decision to prioritize insect-based foods is not surprising.”
Proponents of insects as food for humans, including the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), claim that they are more “sustainable” and have a “lower carbon footprint” compared to traditional livestock.
However, animal-based foods like beef, pork and poultry are more efficient and healthy sources of protein.
“The truth is that beef, pork, poultry and other animal-based foods are the most efficient and healthy sources of protein,” Bruner told The Defender.
“These climate fanatics pushing insect-based foods are scaring people into adopting less healthy diets.”
While advocates see insects as a viable protein source for the future, there are concerns about safety and health risks, such as parasites and allergies.
The push from power-hungry globalists also raises questions about the motives behind promoting insect-based foods.
“The justification for insects is to produce protein using fewer inputs: to save the planet by reducing climate change, methane from cows, less pollution,” Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, said.
“But just because it is protein doesn’t mean it’s good for us.”
Nass cited parasites that could be spread by insects, difficulties in digesting insects, and common allergies to chitin – commonly found on the exoskeleton of insects.
She suggested that one reason behind the shift to insects as food is “to cause emotional harm: to degrade, debase, downgrade human beings.”
Beef is “being demonized,” potentially to “weaken the species,” Nass notes.
Dutch journalist Elze van Hamelen told The Defender that using insect ingredients for pet food also poses a risk to public health.
Van Hamelen cites a 2019 study that found parasites in 244 of 300 insect farms and pet stores that were investigated.
In Singapore, local businesses are embracing insect-based foods, however.
Some are already offering insect-infused dishes.
Educational programs are being implemented to inform consumers, including children, about the alleged “benefits” of consuming insects.
Some educational programs began before approval had been obtained.
For example, Singapore’s first start-up to make food from insects conducted workshops and educational sessions at almost a hundred schools before the Singapore Food Agency approved insects for human consumption.
Surveys conducted after the program found that about 80% of students would be willing to try the insects after they are approved.
Educational programs are part of the psychological techniques deployed to get people to accept insects as food.
Several studies in 2020, 2021, and 2022 suggested that behavioral science concepts like nudging should be used to influence public acceptance of insect-based foods.
That nudging is already being widely used to implement the UN’s Agenda 2030.
According to Rectenwald, “sustainability” is code language for coerced reductions in consumption and forced behavioral modifications.
In addition to debasing people and so gaining psychological power over them, there is enormous financial gain to be had for those driving the insect-based diets agenda.
“Bill Gates claims his investments in alternative proteins are to save the planet,” Bruner said.
“What he does not say is that they are part of a strategy to monopolize the protein industry – for profit – as he lobbies to ban animal-based competition.”
