Major banks are being ordered to debank and defund the world’s leading meat and dairy producers as part of an effort to allegedly “fight climate change.”
The move seeks to force a global ban on the general public consuming meat and dairy while bypassing legislative measures.
The war on the global food supply is ramping up, and major meat and dairy producers are now in the crosshairs of a globalist collective of groups funded by the World Economic Forum (WEF), Bill Gates, and the United Nations (UN).
Globalists are now threatening major banks like Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorgan Chase, demanding that their loan departments stop financing meat, dairy, and feed operations around the globe.
The banks are being pressured to begin closing the accounts of companies that operate in the food supply.
At least 105 climate change organizations have come together to put pressure on the major banks.
The world is inching closer to adopting a finance system that prioritizes carbon credits and social credit scores that cater to left-wing political agendas, DEI quotas, and the demands of the globalists who seek to engineer our way of life.
Major climate change donors are propping up climate change organizations around the globe.
These climate change organizations are acting on behalf of their donors, as they try to radically transform the food supply and energy infrastructure around the world.
These radical transformations include ending fossil fuels, curtailing fertilizer use and shutting down meat and dairy producers globally.
Eradicating carbon emissions to zero is the end goal, no matter if world populations are forced to starve in the process.
These 105 puppet climate change organizations have magically come together to pressure major banks to halt their financing of industrial livestock and dairy production.
The letter attempts to shame these financial institutions by claiming they play a role in “exacerbating the climate crisis through their support of meat, dairy and feed corporations.”
These puppet organizations seek to shut down financing to companies like JBS S.A. (JBSAY), Tyson Foods Inc. (TSN), Cargill and Nestlé S.A. (NESN and NSRGY), among others who are instrumental in producing meat and dairy for supermarkets around the world.
The letter condemns the environmental impacts of industrial livestock production.
The signatories argue that the industry’s emissions contribute to global warming and biodiversity loss while also inflicting substantial harm on animal welfare and human rights.
The climate change coup folks claim that “industrial livestock production is one of the most destructive activities for our planet.”
“Most global food and agriculture emissions come from livestock production, and studies have found that global livestock production will use almost half of the world’s emissions budget by 2030 and 80% by 2050,” the letter states.
The letter does not outline a conservation plan or provide a pathway to remove actual pollutants and toxic chemicals from the food supply.
The letter says halting the expansion of industrial livestock is “one of the most climate positive actions banks can take.” In unison, the hivemind organizations demand:
“By continuing to finance meat, dairy, and feed corporations, banks are complicit in driving climate change and environmental degradation, undermining their own climate commitments.”
The climate change coup people argue that meat, dairy and feed corporations have accessed $615 billion in credit since the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement.
The letter specifically addresses 58 banks that have financed meat and dairy production, with 70 percent of the total meat and dairy financing going to facilities that produce methane emissions.
These organizations demand that banks recognize industrial livestock production as “high-emitting” and curtail agriculture loans, forcing clients to disclose and adhere to verified climate targets.
Additionally, they demand that no new financing be allowed for livestock production.
Instead, they want to force meat producers to address broader social and environmental harms by paying, essentially, climate change fines. In the future, clients may receive carbon credits to reward their compliance with this hysterical*, radical climate change agenda.
“Alarmingly, our analysis shows that funding to these polluting companies is on the rise, despite scientists’ warnings that global livestock emissions need to start declining sharply,” said Martin Bowman, Senior Policy and Campaigns Manager at Feedback Global.
“Industrial livestock companies are incompatible with a safe future for our planet, so it is time for banks and investors to turn off the taps and stop providing the finance that is enabling them to grow.”
The climate change plan is nothing but demolition to the food supply, with no transition plan to introduce alternatives.
That’s because the alternative is meat and dairy restrictions for everyone, starting with high prices for real food.
These controls will devolve into carbon credits for producers who comply with climate change agendas, with banks only allowing financing for clients who buy into the climate change hysteria.
The remaining food infrastructure will favor the rich and well connected, with bugs, ultra-processed foods and synthetic meat strains for the peons.
