A group of leading scientists and academics has signed a letter that calls on lawmakers to ban Covid mRNA “vaccines” due to the “substantial risk” of cancer from the injections.
The call was made due to the unprecedentedly high levels of synthetic DNA contamination in the shots produced by vaccine makers Pfizer and Moderna.
Eminent scientists and academics warn that this DNA contamination is causing genomic integration and triggering long-term health impacts, including cancers, among the Covid-vaccinated.
The letter was signed by leading experts from around the world.
The co-signees include Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish, Emeritus Professor Wendy Hoy, an expert in chronic disease, Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy, an immunologist who developed a bronchitis vaccine, geneticist Professor Alexandra Henrion Caude, and microbiologist Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD.
The letter was sent to Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and circulated among top government officials, including all of the nation’s senators and members of parliament.
Russell Broadbent, independent MP for the federal seat of Monash, authored the letter.
Broadbent warns that “immediate action through a suspension of these products is critical to mitigate further risk.”
He writes in the letter that urgent calls are being made to pull the “vaccines” after independent testing of Australian vials of mRNA, or modified RNA (mod-RNA), Covid vaccines detected residual synthetic DNA at levels up to 145 times above the legal limit.
Broadbent and the group of experts are asking the prime minister to adopt a “precautionary approach.”
An accompanying science summary describes the concerns of Broadbent and co-signatories.
The summary includes the recommendation that “the Minister for Agriculture initiate a Biosecurity Import Risk Analysis of these products, potentially leading to the suspension of these products due to the risks they pose to human health.”
Detailing the results of independent testing of the vaccines to date, the summary explains:
“Excessive synthetic foreign DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles can integrate into human cells, potentially leading to genomic instability, cancers, immune system disruption and adverse hereditary effects.:
Residual synthetic DNA is a byproduct of the mod-RNA vaccine manufacturing process.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Australia’s equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has limits in place for synthetic DNA contamination.
Residual synthetic DNA is allowed under TGA regulations in levels of up to 10 nanograms (ng) per vaccine dose.
This regulatory limit was set for traditional vaccines and was not amended for mod-RNA products using lipid nanoparticles (LNPs).
The summary goes on to explain why the LNP packaging of residual synthetic DNA makes these products different to traditional vaccines that may contain “naked” residual DNA.
“Crucially, naked DNA has no ability to cross cell membranes and enter cells. In contrast, synthetic DNA encapsulated in LNPs possesses a high transfection efficiency, meaning, the LNP-modDNA complexes are efficient at delivering synthetic DNA into human cells,” the summary states.
The summary cites research indicating that the presence of foreign DNA within the cell alone can induce cancer.
However, the risk is greatly increased if the DNA enters the cell nucleus.
This can occur in dividing cells, and the presence of an SV40 enhancer sequence (in Pfizer only).
SV40 is “long known to assist entry into the nucleus, even when cells are not undergoing cell division,” increasing the risk further.
The summary explains that once synthetic DNA is inside the cell nucleus, genomic integration is possible.
And, “when genomic integration of foreign DNA occurs at the wrong place within the genome, it frequently induces malignant diseases, cancers, especially leukemia.”
The summary lists 19 resources from the scientific literature justifying the stated concerns about genomic integration and cancer formation arising from synthetic DNA contamination and calls for a full and thorough investigation.
Additionally, the summary cites putative evidence of genomic integration of residual synthetic DNA from the Pfizer vaccine in cancer cell lines.
To date, regulators, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), have said that the LNP packaging of residual synthetic DNA is of no significance, that the vaccines are not contaminated with high levels of DNA, and that the vaccine contents cannot enter the cell nucleus or genomically integrate.
Notably, the TGA did not require testing for carcinogenicity or genotoxicity before providing provisional approval and, eventually, full registration for mod-RNA Covid vaccines.
Regulators maintain that they are unconcerned by the potential risks posed by reported high levels of synthetic DNA in the Covid mRNA injections.
However, several independent labs are now carrying out testing of human tissue to see if these potential risks are indeed occurring.
The letter, dated September 25, 2024, is in full below:
Dear Prime Minister,
I refer to my letter of September 20th 2024 calling on the Government to immediately suspend the use of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 products due to the evidence of significant synthetic DNA contamination, as detailed in Dr. David Speicher’s report.
Unlike the Thalidomide tragedy, which resulted in over 10,000 victims globally, the COVID-19 vaccines have been administered to more than 20 million Australians, totalling over 63 million doses. The contamination detected in these vaccines, if not addressed, presents a substantial risk, with the potential for these dangers – such as genomic integration and potential long-term health impacts – to multiply with each additional dose administered. Immediate action through a suspension of these products is critical to mitigate further risk.
To assist in adopting a precautionary approach and minimising further harm, I enclose a Science Summary created and endorsed by eminent Australian and international scientists and medical experts. The summary reinforces the known and potential dangers of DNA contamination and highlights the need for an urgent and independent investigation. As advised by the co-signatories, the Department of Health and Aged Care has produced no evidence to demonstrate why the detected DNA contamination will not produce the dire adverse health outcomes detailed in the Science Summary.
Additionally, I have reason to believe that multiple attempts by prominent scientists to warn the TGA of these risks have been disregarded since early 2021, raising serious questions about the agency’s ability to protect the health and well-being of Australians.
Finally, I draw your attention to the Biosecurity Act 2015, which may now be relevant. Given the contamination evidence, I recommend the Minister for Agriculture initiate a Biosecurity Import Risk
Analysis of these products, potentially leading to the suspension of these products due to the risks they pose to human health.
I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the 52 co-signatories below in the preparation of this letter and reiterate my call seeking your urgent action to ensure the safety of all Australians.
Yours sincerely,
Russell Broadbent MP Member for Monash
This is the second letter sent to the Australian leader on the contamination issue by Broadbent.
In the previous letter, sent to the PM on September 20th, Broadbent, who is known for his advocacy for the Covid vaccine injured, criticized the Department of Health (DOH) and the TGA for “ignoring repeated warnings by experts” over the synthetic DNA contamination.
The contamination was first detected by genomics scientist Kevin McKernan in early 2023.
McKernan’s findings were subsequently replicated by scientists in Germany, the U.S., Canada and most recently Australia, by Dr. David Speicher.
